Argument's Peculiar Adversariality

Office/Remote Location

Room 128

Description

John Casey, Dept. of Philosophy, Northeastern Illinois University — This talk proposes a new defense of the thesis that argument is essentially adversarial. While previous defenses of this thesis have centered on the kinds of states beliefs or commitments are, this paper will focus on inference, which is the process that brings these states about. To sketch the core idea: When someone shares reasons with another, they aren’t merely offering a menu of options to take or leave; rather, they’re attempting to make the other person enact the inference directed. Although inference is something one, in a sense, does, it is not an action (like lifting your arm or singing).

Price

Free

Admission Information

Open to the public.

Contact Information

Department of Philosophy
Jessica Sturges

External Sponsor

UNLV Dept. of Philosophy