UNLV Forensic Case Collection
The forensic remains present at UNLV are the result of
consultations with the anthropology department by Nevada law
enforcement and other agencies. Dr. Sheilagh Brooks, who was a
professor with the Anthropology Department from 1965 to 1992, was the leading physical anthropologist involved in the
establishment and analysis of these collections.
The forensic remains currently housed at UNLV were brought by
the Nevada coroner and local police agencies for identification.
The human remains are often partial, fragmentary, or both and
therefore difficult to identify and reconstruct without expert
opinion. If the remains are not identified or claimed they are
often left in the UNLV collection. Most of the forensic cases in
the collection have little or no archaeological context or
documentation.
The collection currently consists of 72
individuals of human remains. Some of these cases originated
from outside Nevada and include locations from: Provo, Utah; Mt.
Trimble School, Arizona; and Death Valley, California. Nevada
counties represented included Churchill, Clark, Elko, Humboldt,
Lincoln, Nye, Pershing, Reno, Washoe, and White Pine. Two
remains from Lyon county were deaccessioned; one was identified
and handed over to law enforcement and the other was repatriated
by the Yerington Northern Paiute Tribe in 1997. Human remains
are still accepted by the Department of Anthropology for
identification by the departments physical anthropologists.
The remains housed at the UNLV
Forensic Lab are used in the training of students in forensic
methods, taphonomy, comparative and interpretative studies of
Forensic Anthropology. The remains are used for student theses,
dissertations and course work. They are also available for
research by outside professionals upon approval by the
department. It is important for the unidentified remains to be available for
research as each time an analysis is performed by student or
professional, additional data is gathered that may aid in the
future identification of the skeletal remains of the individual.
The Kyle Brothers
A
publication of an analysis of a set of human skeletal remains
from the UNLV forensic collection was done by Dr.'s Sheilagh and
Richard Brooks (Brooks and Brooks 1984). The remains are from
the Kyle (Kiel) ranch located in North Las Vegas, NV. Through a detailed forensic
analysis this
publication provided information that changed the historical
account involving the Kyle Brothers from a murder suicide to a
double murder. The murders
took place at the turn of the century when census records place the population of the Las Vegas Valley
at 30 individuals (Paher
1971).
Historical Record:
The historic account states that on October 11, 1900 the bodies
of Edwin and William Kiel were found by their neighbors, the
Stewart's (Roske 1986). Edwin Kiel was found on the kitchen
floor with a pistol near his right hand and a gun shot wound to
the head.
William Kiel was found lying partially submerged in an
irrigation ditch about 30 feet away from the house with an
unloaded and unfired shotgun at his feet and shotgun wounds to
the head and left arm.
The original jury report stated that
Edwin Kiel had an entry wound above the right eye. William Kiel
had sustained several injuries including a shotgun wound to the
left arm between
the elbow and wrist, a second that passed through the trunk, and
a third that lodged in the head near the left eye. Due to the
wounds and powder burns on Edwin's body and the location of the
guns, it was concluded that Edwin had killed William and then in
remorse killed himself. There was however, some speculation at this time that
Archibald Steward's son Hiram. had sought revenge on the Kiel
brothers for their possible involvement in the death of
Archibald Stewart on the Kiel ranch in 1884 (Roske 1986).
Exhumation:
In 1975 the historic family cemetery located on the Kiel Ranch
was excavated as part of the acquisition of the land by the City
of North Las Vegas. It was determined that the land on which the cemetery
was located was going to be impacted and therefore the bodies
should be exhumed to be eventually re-interred on city-owned land.
Elizabeth Warren, then Historian and District Interpreter for
Nevada State Parks, had researched the site and informed the
archaeologist involved that there were at least two burials -
Conrad Kiel (father) and Mrs. Latimer, but that it was unknown
if the Kiel brothers were also buried at this location. Upon
excavation of the site four adult burials and one infant burial
were encountered. Burial Number 1 (KHR1 - Kyle Human Remains No.
1) is identified as Mrs. Latimer, Burial Number 2 (KHR2) is
Conrad Kiel, Burial Number 3 (KHR3) is Edwin Kiel, Burial Number
4 (KHR4) is William Kiel, and Burial Number 5 is an unidentified
infant burial. All of the adult burials were positioned within
wooden coffins with their heads to the West except Edwin Kiel
who's head was placed to the East probably indicating the jury's
verdict of a murderer and suicide.
Forensic Analysis:
The descriptive analysis of the skeletal remains of Edwin Kiel
revealed significant clues to the cause of death. A gun shot
wound entrance hole was identified on the left occipital bone
(back of the head). This means that the left facial wounds
described in the historic record were the result of the a .44 or
.45 caliber bullet exiting the cranium. The conclusion of S.T.
Brooks and Dr. Raymond Rawson D.A.B.F.O. who X-rayed the
remains, is that Edwin Kiel was probably ambushed as he walked
out of the ranch house and shot with either a .44 or .45
revolver from close quarters from behind (Brooks and Brooks
1984). This forensic analysis changes the historical conclusion
from a murder suicide to a double murder.
The shotgun wounds of William Kiel support this theory. The
forensic evidence tells us that one of the shotgun wounds was to
the left lower arm shattering the ulna and radius, perhaps as he
threw up his arm in defense. The second shotgun wound struck the
head from a different angle than the first, indicating that this
was a murder maybe by more than one individual and with at least
two different weapons (Brooks and Brooks 1984).
This is an excellent example of a
forensic analysis providing detailed evidence from skeletal
remains. The cause of death, types of weapons used, as well as
the positioning of the wounds, was reconstructed using forensic methods. This in turn suggests a sequence of events
leading to the death of these two brothers (a double murder
verses a murder -suicide). Since the original publication by
Brooks and Brooks. students from the Anthropology Department have analyzed the
remains of Edwin and William and have found further evidence of
trauma including a bullet imbedded into the third thoracic
vertebra (Alison Velier personal communication 2000). Thus
confirming that the practice of multiple analysis contributes to
additional understanding of each case study presented to the
UNLV Forensic Lab for analysis.